Dan Ariely usuually gives you a viewpoint that is very often different and thought provoking. The article I amplified is I believe in the Dec edition of HBR Amplify’d from hbr.org If you practice kicking a soccer ball with your eyes closed, it takes only a few tries to become quite good at predicting where the ball will end up. But when “random noise” is added to the situation—a dog chases the ball, a stiff breeze blows through, a neighbor passes by and kicks the ball—the results become quite unpredictable. If you had to evaluate the kicker’s performance, would you punish him for not predicting that Fluffy would run off with the ball? Would you switch kickers in an attempt to find someone better able to predict Fluffy’s involvement? That would be absurd. And yet it’s exactly how we reward and punish managers. Managers attempt to make sense of the environment and predict what will result from their decisions. Read more at hbr.org See...
Turning complex tech trends into business revenue since 2005. Industry Analyst, C-Level Advisor, and Host of Talking Headless Show about Analyst Relations and Tech Analysts. Insights on AI, CX, and Enterprise Software—without the hype. Broad Coverage and Practical advice on navigating the AI and Software landscape. Focused on strategy, clarity, and growth.